Teaching Grammar Form: Direct instruction vs. contextual learning

Больше
6 дн. 5 ч. назад #190 от makhtanova00@mail.ru
As for me grammar forms should  be taught in context to help students understand their practical use in real communication. However, some direct instruction is beneficial, especially for introducing rules or clarifying confusing structures. Generally balanced approach works best: combine contextual learning and direct instruction. 
For instance, while teaching past simple to 5th grades, First and fore most I shared a short story or simple example and highlihted verbs like opened or played in context. Students identified patterns and practiced creating their own sentences. In my opinion, this approach os more effective, because they saw the relevance and retained the rules better.
Спасибо сказали: alista1802, SabinAssilova, bakhtigul.isabek

Пожалуйста Войти или Регистрация, чтобы присоединиться к беседе.

Больше
6 дн. 3 ч. назад #191 от kmd_2000@mail.ru
Teaching grammar in context is an important component of effective language teaching. This method not only enriches the understanding of grammatical rules, but also ensures their practical use in real social situations. The most effective way is practical examples. Let's say a teacher provides students with a text about a trip and asks them to highlight examples of the use of certain tenses of verbs in the text. This method allows students not only to see how grammar works in real sentences, but also to understand how the rules can change in different contexts. Teaching grammar through context also involves creating real-world scenarios in which students can apply the rules they have learned. For example, when studying conditional sentences, students are asked to consider situations from their daily lives and express them using appropriate conditional constructions.
Спасибо сказали: alista1802, bakhtigul.isabek

Пожалуйста Войти или Регистрация, чтобы присоединиться к беседе.

Больше
6 дн. 1 ч. назад #192 от ehm_tanya@mail.ru
1. First and foremost grammar forms should be taught directly backed by the robust theoretical and practical materials. A great deal of time needs to be contributed to covering the critical issues of the theme in question. Dwelling on the grammar rules promotes better understanding and consolidating grammar theme. Afterwards, students will find it easier to apply acqired knoweledge within context. But they should bear in mind that practice makes perfect.  
2. Predominantely, students are into play-based lessons to study grammar. In this regard, direct instructions appear to be pretty effective. As a teacher of the first-year students I conducted a fun drawing activity in terms of homophones. I called out a word revised within our grammar theme, i.e. "date", then asked students to draw two different pictures that fit the word. As a result, educators took in the material and enjoyed the time as well.
Спасибо сказали: alista1802, Tsantsuraeva, bakhtigul.isabek

Пожалуйста Войти или Регистрация, чтобы присоединиться к беседе.

Больше
6 дн. 27 мин. назад #193 от Kuatbayeva Nazerke
I believe grammar should be taught both directly and within context, depending on the situation. Direct teaching is useful for beginners or when introducing complex grammar rules, as it gives clear structure. Contextual learning, on the other hand, helps students see how grammar works in real-life situations and makes it easier to remember. For example, when teaching past perfect tense to beginners, explaining the rule first and then giving practice exercises helped them understand the structure clearly. In a conversation activity, students used conditionals naturally when discussing future plans. This approach helped them apply the grammar in real conversations and remember it better.So, combining both methods is usually the most effective way to teach grammar.
Спасибо сказали: alista1802, SabinAssilova, bakhtigul.isabek

Пожалуйста Войти или Регистрация, чтобы присоединиться к беседе.

Больше
5 дн. 7 ч. назад #195 от shoqanay
1. I believe grammar forms should be taught both directly and within context. Direct instruction helps learners understand the learners understand the rules clearly, especially when starting with a new concept. Contextual learning, on the other hand, helps students see how the grammar works in real world communication, which makes it more meaningdul and memorable. The combination of both is ideal for effective learning.
2. Yes, I taught past tense forms to ESL learners. At first, I used diresct inctruction where I explained the rules and had them memorize verb forms. However, they struggled to use it in conversation. So, I shifted to contextual learning by having them crate stories abouth their past experinces. This helped them apply the grammar naturally, and their accuracy in using the past tense improved significantly.
Direct instruction was helpful for introducing the rules, but contextual learning was more effective in helping them use the grammar confidently in real situatons.
 
Спасибо сказали: alista1802, SabinAssilova, bakhtigul.isabek

Пожалуйста Войти или Регистрация, чтобы присоединиться к беседе.

Больше
5 дн. 19 мин. назад #200 от Макарчук
Teaching grammar in context is distinctive in that it is embedded and integrated into other aspects of the English curriculum (creative writing and analytical reading). In my opinion, it is not necessary to choose only one type of grammar teaching. In some cases, it will be more convenient to present a grammatical rule directly, especially when the topic is new. When you want to develop a task for repetition and consolidation, it will be much more concise to take the grammar within context.
Спасибо сказали: alista1802, Tsantsuraeva, bakhtigul.isabek

Пожалуйста Войти или Регистрация, чтобы присоединиться к беседе.

Время создания страницы: 0.717 секунд
Работает на Kunena форум