Teaching Grammar Form: Direct instruction vs. contextual learning

I think that grammar should be taught contextually cause when we speak in our native language we don’t think about grammar. If even it isn’t correct but we understand. If we think only about grammar it will make a strong barrier to speak and communicate

I think that grammar forms are most effectively taught within context, as it helps students understand their practical application in real communication. However, direct instruction can be useful for clarifying rules and addressing specific challenges.For example, in my teaching experience, contextual learning worked well when teaching past tense forms through storytelling. Students used verbs naturally while narrating events, which reinforced usage. Conversely, direct instruction was effective for clarifying irregular verb conjugations, as it addressed common errors quickly and systematically.A balance of both approaches ensures deeper understanding and practical fluency.

Grammar forms and terms are fundamental to mastering any language. However, there's a debate on the most effective way to teach these structures. Should they be taught directly, or is it better to integrate them within context? Let's dive into this discussion and share our insights, experiences, and strategies.

1. Do you believe grammar forms should be taught directly or within context? Why?
2. Can you share an example from your teaching experience where direct instruction or contextual learning of grammar forms was particularly effective (or ineffective)?